The coins in the cashiers

The denominator is 7, not 12. The five cashiers that were not opened count for nothing, in either direction.

A point is given for five coins or more. That is not a claim that breadth is better: a cashier with three values may be entirely sufficient. The point records that the breadth is known — that somebody opened the cashier and counted.

The practical effect is about fees. The network fee is set by the chain, not by the house. The same amount sent as bitcoin and as a value-stable coin on a cheaper network can cost very differently on the same evening.

A separate point is given for a value-stable coin in the cashier. The reason is not the rate itself but what happens to a balance that sits still: a wagering requirement can run for several evenings, and a balance in bitcoin is worth something different at the end of it.

«Value-stable» means the coin is built to track the dollar rather than float freely. It does not mean the balance is risk-free, and it does not mean it stands still measured in kroner — the krone moves against the dollar as it always did. The catalogue records whether such a coin is in the cashier, because that is a readable property of the cashier, and takes no position on the construction behind it.

Five of the twelve entries read «cashier not opened». That costs three of the ten fields — cashier opened, value-stable coin, five coins or more — and is the main reason those entries sit at the bottom of the ranking.

Three empty fields are not three bad properties. They are three pieces of information the catalogue does not have, listed as exactly that.

Lists that fill such cells with figures from another list are, in practice, reproducing a guess at two removes: somebody read once, somebody else copied, and none of the dates travelled with it. Here the field stays empty until someone has seen the cashier.

The fee on a withdrawal is set by the chain, not by the house, and it moves with traffic. The same amount sent as bitcoin and as a value-stable coin on a cheaper network can cost very differently on the same evening — which is why a wider cashier is worth something in practice, even though the catalogue takes no view on breadth being «better».

Which networks a given house offers sits in the cashier itself, at deposit and withdrawal. The catalogue does not reproduce it: it changes more often than the coin list does, and a stale network list is worse than none.

The neighbouring question is handled in about this catalogue. The part of the count left out here sits in bitcoin casino norway 2026. Where this matters in practice is set out in every entry in the catalogue.